The honest number beside “jobs created” depends on what the form counts: payroll employees, paid contractors, sustained livelihoods, or every person who completed a task. A founder should choose one defensible definition, state it plainly, and keep the evidence behind the number.
At 9:17 p.m., Kojo stopped at an empty box on an awards form. His laptop was balanced beside a cold cup of tea in his Accra flat, and the application closed that night. The label said “Jobs created.”
Kojo is an invented composite, but the decision is familiar. His software company had two full-time employees in Ghana. A designer in Lagos worked with the team most weeks but invoiced monthly. A machine-learning engineer in Berlin had completed a six-week contract. Three people had handled research, testing and customer support during the last product release.
Was the answer two, seven, or something in between?
If Kojo entered two, the company looked smaller than the operation he had built. If he entered seven, he risked claiming temporary work as permanent employment. The award mattered because its credibility could influence a partnership already under discussion. A generous interpretation might help him reach the shortlist. It could also leave him explaining a number he no longer believed.
The cursor kept blinking.
One box can hide four different questions
“Jobs created” sounds precise until you try to count.
A payroll employee has a clear relationship with the company. A contractor may work beside that employee for months, join the same calls and own equally important work. A specialist hired for one integration contributes something real, then leaves. A part-time support worker may depend more heavily on the income than a highly paid adviser who contributes two hours each month.
Each person represents work created by the company. They do not all represent the same kind of job.
The form’s empty box removes those distinctions. It turns employment into a single number, then invites founders to supply their own definition without admitting they have done so.
That ambiguity creates a temptation. Choose the broadest count now. Work out the explanation if anyone asks later.
I have seen the same logic enter hiring plans. A funding memo starts with the team the founder expects to employ after demand arrives, then quietly treats those future roles as evidence of current progress. The arithmetic becomes persuasive before the customer case does. I wrote about a related mistake in the funding memo that assumed unearned demand.
The useful number is the one you can reconstruct
Kojo opened a blank spreadsheet.
He added one row for every person the company had paid, then four columns: working relationship, period of engagement, regularity of work and current status. The total did not become more impressive. It became more legible.
Two people were current full-time employees. One was a recurring independent contractor. Four had completed defined pieces of work and were no longer engaged.
That record gave him three honest numbers, each answering a different question:
- The company currently employed two people full time.
- One additional contractor worked with the team regularly.
- Four other specialists had received paid project work.
The awards form allowed only one entry, so Kojo entered two. In the supporting text, he described the contractor and project work separately.
This approach can feel conservative, especially when another applicant may count every paid contributor. But a number earns authority through its boundary. “Two full-time roles, plus five paid contractor engagements” tells a reader more than “seven jobs” because the reader can see what happened.
The same discipline matters beyond awards. Investors, potential partners and future hires will make different assumptions when they hear “ten-person team.” If six people are available only when commissioned, the company’s delivery capacity, monthly costs and management obligations look different. The distinction can change a deal.
Employment claims should survive the follow-up question
A useful test is simple: imagine the reviewer asks for the names, dates and working relationships behind the number.
Could you answer without changing your definition?
If the count includes contractors, say so. If it includes only roles that still exist, state the date of the snapshot. If a person moved from project work to payroll, record the transition once rather than counting the same person twice. Keep aspirations out of the total. Planned hires belong in a hiring plan.
This can expose a harder truth. Sometimes the company has generated considerable paid work without creating stable employment yet. That is still an economic contribution. It simply needs its own language.
Founders working across Ghana, Nigeria, South Africa, Europe and the US often build teams through several employment arrangements because cash flow, specialist availability and market access do not arrive in a neat sequence. Flattening those arrangements into one inflated figure hides how the company actually operates. Separating them shows the decisions underneath.
It also protects the roadmap. Hiring to make the company look complete can consume runway before demand supports the roles. The more useful question is which work must remain inside the team and which work can stay temporary. That tension also sits behind the integration offer that would have cost a founder his roadmap.
Write the definition before entering the number
With minutes left, Kojo returned to the form and typed “2.”
The smaller number did not capture every person whose work had moved the product forward. His note did. It gave the reviewer a current employee count, separated recurring contract work from completed projects, and left no hidden arithmetic to defend later.
Then he saved the spreadsheet beside the application records.
That file was the more valuable outcome. The next time a partner asked about team size, Kojo would not have to reconstruct a confident answer from memory. He could describe the company as it existed that day, including the people carrying ongoing responsibility and the specialists brought in for a defined job.
Before you complete the next award form, investor update or impact report, write one sentence that defines what you count as a job. If the number changes when you read that sentence back, the sentence has done its work.
Comments
No comments yet.