A distribution slide should show the full mechanism that turns interest into payment, including the manual work the founder hopes to automate later. Remove the agents, WhatsApp follow-ups and cash collection, and you may remove the only evidence that the business can reach customers and collect revenue.
Kojo is a composite founder, but the decision is familiar. At 11:18 p.m. in Accra, the night before Demo Day, he was staring at a slide full of arrows while his takeaway went cold beside the laptop.
The product helped small merchants manage stock and reorder supplies. The slide showed field agents introducing it, WhatsApp messages reminding merchants to reorder, and a collector confirming payments. Kojo imagined an investor seeing an expensive operation disguised as software.
He deleted the agents first. Then the WhatsApp follow-ups. Then cash collection.
The slide looked clean. The business disappeared.
The cleaner story removed the customer
By midnight, Kojo’s distribution slide had become a familiar sequence: digital acquisition, product onboarding, recurring revenue. Three boxes. Two arrows. Nothing awkward.
It also described a company he had not built.
His merchants did not wake up searching for inventory software. An agent showed them how missed stock affected sales. The merchants did not complete onboarding alone after watching a polished demo. They sent questions by voice note, sometimes after closing. Payment did not arrive automatically because a dashboard displayed an invoice.
Each manual step carried information.
The agent learned which shop owner made the purchasing decision. The WhatsApp exchange revealed whether a merchant understood the product or was being polite. The collection step exposed whether the reorder had created enough value for someone to part with cash.
Without those steps, Kojo still had software. He no longer had a credible path from software to revenue.
This is easy to miss before a pitch. Founders know investors want margins that improve and operations that scale. Under pressure, we often edit the current business until it resembles the future business. The slide becomes more investable while the explanation becomes less true.
Manual distribution can be evidence
Kojo’s problem was not the presence of people in the process. He had not yet shown what those people were learning, which parts would remain human, and which parts software could eventually absorb.
That distinction matters.
If every sale depends on the founder’s personal relationships, the business has a concentration problem. If an agent follows a repeatable conversation, records the same objections and moves merchants through a consistent next step, the manual work may be an early distribution system.
The same applies to WhatsApp. A founder can describe it as support overhead and hide it. Or he can examine the messages and find the decision path customers actually follow.
Who asks the first question? What creates doubt? Which explanation gets the merchant to try the product? What happens between “this looks useful” and payment?
I would rather see those answers than another arrow labelled “growth.”
This is closely related to the gap in what happens when a demo impresses the user but leaves the payer unconvinced. Product interest and purchasing movement are separate events. Distribution is the work connecting them.
The mechanism belonged on the slide
At 12:07 a.m., Kojo restored the deleted boxes.
This time, he changed what the slide claimed. The agents became the route into merchant groups and the source of structured objections. WhatsApp became the follow-up channel where product questions turned into reorder decisions. Collection became the point where claimed value met actual payment.
He added one final box for the work still unresolved: which steps could move into the product without reducing conversion or trust.
That caveat made the slide stronger. It showed a founder who understood the machine he was operating and could name the parts he had yet to improve.
The bad ending was still possible. Kojo could walk into Demo Day with an operation that looked too expensive to scale. An investor could decide the margins would never support the field work. Cleaning the slide would not change either risk.
Keeping the mechanism visible gave him a defensible conversation. He could explain what the agents did, which actions repeated, where customers stalled, and what evidence he needed before replacing a human step with automation.
The slide stopped promising that distribution had been solved. It showed how distribution currently worked.
Draw the business you have to improve
Before deleting a manual step from a pitch, I use a simple test: if this step vanished tomorrow, would customers still discover the product, understand it, trust it and pay?
A “no” means the step belongs in the model. The next question is what makes it necessary.
Sometimes the answer points to product work. Repeated explanations may reveal weak onboarding. Persistent payment follow-ups may expose a mismatch between the buyer’s routine and the billing method. Founder-led sales may be carrying trust that the brand has not earned yet.
Sometimes the human step should remain. A high-stakes decision may require a conversation. A fragmented market may reward local relationships. A buyer may need reassurance from a person who understands the context.
Kojo closed the laptop after midnight with more boxes on the slide than he wanted. In the morning, he would stand in front of the room and describe a business with field agents, voice notes and collections still inside it.
At least every arrow now had someone doing the work.
Comments
No comments yet.